Sixteen Common Misconceptions About URL Shortener Services

Best Dot Net Training ForumsCategory: GeneralSixteen Common Misconceptions About URL Shortener Services
Williams Mackay asked 9 hours ago

Recently, simply click the next website page following happened to me, I wrote my regular weekly newsletter and posted it on my site. Since this was a longer WordPress URL, like millions of other webmasters, I used a URL shortening service to make this link more usable and manageable.

I posted this shortened URL to Twitter and placed it in my weekly e-mail posting… immediately I started getting emails from my subscribers and followers… the link does not work, you need to have made a mistake.

Which can be effortlessly done, but when I checked the link, I found that the shortening service was not working properly and giving the dreaded “Page Not Found” response. To compound the problem, I was using the Google URL shortener Goo.gl and since it was Google everyone assumed the mistake was on my part. I mean Google is Google.

Within the past, I had been using bit.ly but had switched to Goo.gl, well – because it’s Google. And everything works better with Google; this was the first time something I used with Google had not labored as planned. And it just wasn’t my links, none of the links with Goo.gl were working. No big loss, unless you were linking your Black Friday & Cyber Monday traffic through these shorteners. Ouch.

But this brings up the entire question of regardless of whether you should make use of a link shortener?

A URL link shortener works by redirecting your shorter link to the longer one you have entered into their database. If this really is a permanent 301 redirect, then your SEO benefits should pass through to your longer link. No harm done. But if the shortening service uses a 302 short-term link then SEO isn’t passed through to your longer link considering that the internet search engines only read this link as temporary.

All of the top URL shorteners such as tinyurl, bit.ly and goo.gl uses 301 redirects so they’re SEO friendly, if they are working!

From this SEO perspective, there is absolutely no reason not to use these shortening services, besides they are great for sharing links and getting your links around.

I only started using those link shorteners because of Twitter which only gives you 140 characters to make your point. These shorteners are usually good for sharing and spreading your links around the net. On the contrary, in a proven way using a URL shortener is just not a smart marketing move because you are giving up control of your link, putting it in another person’s hands, within this case Google’s.

If it goes down, or they decide not to link to your content for some reason, you are in trouble. Same goes for bit.ly, they’re in control of your links. Maybe it does not count so much if it really is a general link, but if you a have an affiliate link in there, you can not change or alter it.

Or just imagine, you have 10’s, even 100’s of thousands of these shortened links spread all over the web, bringing valuable SEO PR back to your web site. Suddenly the service or company goes under and all your links disappear from the net overnight.

Web services and sites go bankrupt or change directions each and every day, so the above mentioned scenario just isn’t out of the question. When you are using and according to these shortening services to deliver both traffic and SEO to your web page, then you should ask yourself.